Introduction

> It's clear to me that we cannot claim moral superiority over others if we manipulate questions and outcomes, even in the name of justice.

> Long-form conversations are essential for truly understanding different perspectives and allowing genuine ideas to surface.

Putin

> Meeting Vladimir Putin, I found him overprepared and nervous. My goal wasn't to prove myself as a great interviewer, but to understand who he is and bring more information to the public.

>

> In the interview, I steered away from making it about me and focused on discussing matters of world historic significance, like the war in Ukraine, to offer a different perspective. It's not about asking tough questions, but letting him speak and sharing valuable insights.

> My purpose was to challenge the lies and distortions in the media, especially around the war in Ukraine, and provide more clarity for the American audience. We need to redefine what winning means in this conflict and consider the long-term impact on our country, like the accelerated economic decline due to sanctions.

Navalny

> The death of Navalny was deeply troubling on a personal and political level. It's upsetting to see opposition figures imprisoned anywhere, and I'm firmly against it. However, the geopolitical narrative around his death is steeped in uncertainty. As I put it, "We don't know what happened. We have no freaking idea what happened," and it's frustrating to see politicians act as if they do.

> The U.S. government’s surveillance and interference in media and politics are deeply concerning. The NSA’s monitoring of my communications and their subsequent leaks to the media are unacceptable. As I said, "If the intel services are tampering in elections and information, period... That makes democracy impossible." It's essential to protect the freedoms in our own country rather than be distracted by issues elsewhere.

> Leaders and geopolitical narratives are often oversimplified. Not one leader is purely virtuous or evil. It's important to evaluate leadership based on tangible outcomes rather than rhetoric. "If your life expectancy is going down... you're not a good leader," regardless of the ideals or systems they claim to represent. Our focus should be on real-world results rather than the theatrical portrayal of political figures.

Moscow

> Experiencing Moscow first-hand completely changed my perspective; it was “way nicer” than I ever imagined, with a beauty and order that made me reflect on the decline of American cities, and my disdain shifted towards my own leaders rather than Putin.

> The real tragedy is how we've come to accept a degraded standard of living in the U.S.; we shouldn’t tolerate crime and chaos when we once enjoyed clean, safe streets. “You can have a clean, functional, safe country,” and it’s time we demand it back.

> My trip reinforced the power of direct experience; it shattered preconceived notions fueled by media narratives. It’s critical to see the world for ourselves instead of relying on “liars” to shape our understanding.

Freedom of speech

> I think it's important for Americans to expect more and not be afraid to criticize shortcomings in freedom of speech and press, even if it means facing repercussions. We shouldn't settle for living in fear and compromising our values for comfort. It's about showing courage for the future of our country. Press freedom is not just about theoretical rights, but also practical ability to exercise those rights without fear of consequences or losing your job. We need to challenge the norm and prioritize speaking the truth, even at the risk of facing backlash.

Jon Stewart

> The incident with Jon Stewart on "Crossfire" 20 years ago was initially not significant to me, but its impact was amplified by the early days of YouTube. Stewart called "Crossfire" stupid, which I agreed with, but also labeled me a partisan, which I vehemently disagree with. I've never seen myself as a partisan, especially after my disillusionment with the Iraq War. "You could call me stupid or wrong, but partisan, that's the opposite of true."

> Jon Stewart represents a certain intense partisanship, which is common among those who believe that political debates are the most important issues in the world. This intensity leads to inevitable disappointment, as political solutions can’t resolve deeper existential questions. I find it ironic that figures like him who present as challengers to power actually rarely critique it. "If you're gonna pretend to be the guy who's giving the finger to entrenched power, you should do it once in a while."

> The legacy of that "Crossfire" moment taught me a harsh truth about popularity and perception in media. Despite presenting a fair argument, Stewart's popularity and the media's bias against me led to the perception that he won that encounter. It highlighted that in media battles, the more popular person often prevails in the public eye, regardless of the actual merit of the debate. "In the end, it's just like the more popular guy wins."

Ending the War in Ukraine

> I hope for a settlement in the war on Ukraine, one where both sides feel they're giving a little but can live with it. I believe Putin wants this too, not because Russia is on the brink, but because war is just bad, and the uncertainties and death it brings are tragic. As an American, I think Russia has a valid concern about NATO missiles on its border and question the purpose of NATO, believing it undermines US sovereignty. I advocate for sovereignty for all countries, free from external control.

> Leadership requires caring for those you lead and showing physical courage in times of crisis. I commend Zelensky for staying in Kyiv when others advised him to flee, but the real struggle is between Putin and the US State Department. Unfortunately, the US government's reluctance to engage in negotiations is prolonging the conflict, and as an American, I feel responsible for our role in obstructing peace efforts, leading to more suffering for innocent people in Ukraine.

Nazis

> Putin’s justification for the Ukraine war, using "denazification," struck me as absurd and childish. There’s no real neo-Nazi threat in Ukraine; it's just a tiny, inconsequential part of their society. This misuse of words, calling people Nazis to delegitimize them, doesn't align with the reality of a post-World War II world and makes diplomatic resolutions complex and nonsensical.

> I found Putin’s narrative during the interview about NATO and nationalism to be poorly conveyed and disjointed. He failed to effectively communicate the real fear Russia has of NATO’s eastward expansion, which could have been a compelling story. His isolation during COVID and the prolonged tenure have seemingly made him more autocratic and insulated, highlighting how long-term power can distort leaders’ perspectives.

Putin's health

> - Putin's health seemed fine in person, despite conspiracy theories, with no clear signs of Parkinson's. He appeared younger than his age, showing signs of having had work done.

> - There's a deep-seated resistance in Washington to update views on Russia due to decades of anti-Soviet focus, resulting in a hive mind mentality. This resistance hinders the ability to adapt to new threats, like primarily economic threats, and leads to a narrow and outdated approach to foreign policy based on World War II dynamics.

Hitler

> Interviewing world leaders like Hitler or Putin comes with significant risks and implications. History may depict the interviewer in unexpected ways, but the opportunity to engage in dialogue and record conversations is crucial for understanding and peace.

> Language barriers in interviews, especially with foreign leaders, present unique challenges in communication and understanding nuances in speech and conversation. A fluent understanding of the native language can greatly enhance the depth and quality of the interview process.

Nuclear war

> Living in a "spiritual graveyard," I realize how the quest for fame can consume people. I cherish my happy family and love for nature, which act as anchors, keeping me grounded and preventing me from becoming "the asshole I could easily become." The hunger for validation from strangers? That's "soul poison."

> Observing South Korea's alarming decline in fertility and soaring suicide rates, I can’t help but question how advanced technology, which was believed to be liberating, instead appears to be fueling societal despair. The connection between the ubiquity of tech and these trends cannot be ignored; we’re dancing around a complex issue that we need to confront thoughtfully.

> The rise in ignorance masked by the illusion of knowledge online troubles me. People might think they're informed due to access to information, but as I've seen, the digital landscape often exposes just how little they know. True wisdom lies in recognizing our ignorance, a lesson that continues to be reinforced in my life, especially as I navigate parenting and seek to foster humility.

Trump

> Sentiments and Context: My texts about Trump reflected the frustrations and beliefs I had in the heat of the moment during the chaotic end of the 2020 election. The Trump campaign's incompetence and the difficulty of substantiating election fraud claims made things very challenging. Emotional outburst with my producer was a venting process after dealing with misleading information and public disinformation accusations, a moment of anger that got blown out of proportion.

> Rigged Election and Censorship: I genuinely believe the election was manipulated, not necessarily in terms of direct vote tampering but through systemic changes like mail-in voting and censorship of information. This manipulation undermines democracy because people need unfettered access to information to make informed voting decisions. Biden’s cognitive decline, to me, is evident, and the idea that he represents the best of American leadership is preposterous. His potential re-election would signal a deeply flawed system to the world.

> Systemic Failures and Intelligence Agencies: Our political system is failing, dominated by monopolies and massive federal bureaucracy that stifles genuine democratic processes. There's disturbing evidence of intelligence agencies like the CIA meddling in domestic politics, including confirmed involvement in the Kennedy assassination and influencing recent elections. This corruption is deeply alarming as it subverts the very essence of a representative government, which I passionately believe in despite its imperfections.

Israel-Palestine

> I believe in sovereignty and think each country should make decisions based on its own interests and capabilities.

> The lack of wisdom and short-term thinking in American foreign policy leadership is concerning, and the potential for a major military conflict in the Middle East is real. It's important for countries to tread carefully in such volatile situations.

Xi Jinping

> There's a deep, vital significance in connecting with the world beyond our own borders. “We really are connected, like that's real,” and so engaging with global leaders isn’t just about reporting—it’s about expanding one’s own understanding and practicing humility in the face of a vast, complex world.

> The media landscape is crying out for genuine curiosity, a trait embodied by figures like Joe Rogan and Larry King. They demonstrate that being “intensely curious” allows for richer, deeper conversations, breaking free from the constraints of conventional groupthink that’s so prevalent today.

> Success in marriage, like so many things in life, is rooted in recognizing our limitations and the influence of larger forces beyond our control. It’s not just about personal choices, but about the balance of humility and reality that shapes relationships and sustains them through changes over time, leading to a fulfillment that feels both rare and real.

Advice for young people

> "Nothing else matters but your family." The most fulfilling and natural path in life is creating something beautiful, especially through having children, regardless of financial circumstances. Pursuing money for its own sake is a dead end; true joy comes from the act of creation and connection, and corporate America often undermines this essential truth.

> "I'm an instincts guy, a hundred percent." When it comes to my work with the Tucker Carlson Network, I don't have a grand vision for myself or my career. I simply want to continue talking to people, learning, and employing the team I've worked with for years. This new venture allows me to focus on what I love and excel at while avoiding the tasks I'm not suited for.

Hope for the future

> People are inherently great and complicated, and despite bad leaders, I hold hope because individuals across the world bring joy and connection. The human mind is a special creation, a source of creativity that should never be tampered with by technology like brain implants, as it poses a profound ethical concern.

> Technology's heedless advancement worries me, especially when driven by short-sighted leaders who lack long-term thinking. It’s essential to intentionally consider whether innovations bring net gains or losses to humanity. Long-term planning and a moral commitment to future generations are crucial, but unfortunately rare among today's power holders.